Decision Making Under Uncertainty
A structured process for making high-stakes decisions with incomplete information, built to be used on a real decision your team is facing right now, not a hypothetical one.
How this differs from The Psychology of Better Decisions: this workshop is a process applied to one real, live decision. The Psychology of Better Decisions explains the mechanics of decision-making in general. Bring an actual pending decision to this one.
Most important decisions get made with incomplete information, under time pressure, with people who don't fully agree. This workshop doesn't promise to remove the uncertainty. It gives you a process for deciding well inside it.
Who this is for
Leaders, project owners, and teams facing a live decision with real stakes (a market entry, a hire, a pivot, a resourcing call), where waiting for more data is itself a decision.
The problem
Organizations often respond to uncertainty by stalling (more meetings, more research, more sign-offs), while the cost of not deciding keeps accumulating. Others swing the other way and decide too fast to protect the appearance of momentum. Both are avoidance dressed up as diligence or decisiveness.
What you'll explore
The difference between risk (known odds) and true uncertainty (unknown odds)
Separating what's actually unknown from what's simply undiscussed
Naming assumptions before they get treated as facts
Prioritizing which unknowns are worth resolving before deciding, and which aren't
Reversible vs. irreversible decisions, and why they deserve different processes
The emotional pull toward more analysis, and when analysis has become procrastination
Moving from options to a decision without forcing false consensus
What you'll take away
A repeatable process (not a formula), for structuring a live decision, plus the judgment to know which parts of that process a given decision actually needs.
Learning outcomes
Separate a genuine unknown from an assumption being treated as fact
Classify a pending decision as reversible or irreversible and adjust process accordingly
Identify which additional information is actually worth waiting for
Run a structured options comparison under time pressure
Recognize when further analysis has stopped adding value
Convert group disagreement into an owned decision without forcing artificial consensus
2h – 1 day
Corporate · Public
Leadership teams
Best for
Practical exercises
Mapping a real pending decision onto a known / unknown / assumed grid
A reversibility test applied to the group's own live decision
A timed options-comparison exercise under an artificial deadline
"What would change your mind": identifying the smallest piece of information that would actually shift the decision
Methodology
Works best anchored to one real decision the group brings into the room, with confidentiality respected throughout. Short framework input followed by direct application; the facilitator functions closer to a structured-thinking partner than a lecturer.
Example agenda: full day, applied to a real decision
0:00
Framing: risk vs. uncertainty, and why more data isn't always the answer
0:30
Mapping the group's real decision: known, unknown, assumed
1:30
Reversibility and stakes: how much process this decision actually needs
2:15
Options comparison exercise
4:00
"What would change your mind", resolving the highest-value unknowns
4:45
Making the call: converting the room's input into an owned decision
5:15
Close and next steps
FAQ
Do we need to bring a real decision into the room?
It works best that way, and the full-day and corporate formats are built around it. The public workshop format uses facilitator-provided scenarios instead.
How is this different from The Psychology of Better Decisions?
This is a process workshop for one specific decision. The Psychology of Better Decisions explains the mechanics of decision-making generally. Many organizations book both, in either order.
Is this only useful for major, high-stakes decisions?
It's built for consequential decisions, but the reversibility test in particular is just as useful for recognizing when a smaller decision doesn't need this much process at all.
Can this be delivered as a keynote?
Not in its core form, the value comes from applying the process to a real decision. A shorter framework talk is available on request.
What kind of groups does this work best with?
Intact teams and leadership groups with shared ownership of the decision in question, the process depends on genuine authority to act on what the group concludes.
Bring your next big decision into the room.
Book a corporate session
AI, Thinking & Human Decision Making
A forward-looking look at how AI changes decision processes, automation, judgment, and where human responsibility remains essential, not another "how to use AI tools" session.
Critical Thinking at Work
A practical companion to The Psychology of Better Decisions, applied to the reports, proposals, and claims professionals evaluate every week.
The Psychology of Better Decisions
How cognitive bias, framing, and social pressure shape professional decisions, and how to catch them in the moment, not just in hindsight.